Many of the great photographers were great musicians as well. Think Ansel Adams and Paul Caponigro. Their playing benefited their photography. I’d like to think I’m a good photographer. I listen to a lot of music, but I don’t play an instrument. After lunch on Saturday I attended a beautiful concert performed by a New York based violin, cello and oboe trio of classical music by American composers that for the most part I was unfamiliar with. Didn’t matter, it was wonderful and the three women that played it were even better! As I left I felt both inspired and energized, then went on to the next big thing of the day … to participate in and photograph the local D-Day Rally commemorating the 82^ndanniversary of D-Day and the ongoing struggle against fascism in our country.

The rally was great. Run by veterans that are activists fighting the onslaught on our democracy. I sang If I Had A Hammer and other protest songs from when I was young. Then I shed a few tears as the veterans spoke about their parents and grandparents who participated in D-Day, the sacrifices they made for our nation, and how those in power are trying to take away from us all that those brave men and women fought for.  One of the scheduled speakers, a former Army Ranger who had deployed six times to Afghanistan and Iraq couldn’t make the event because he was arrested and detained for the second time protesting out front of the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey. I cried again as another veteran spoke on his behalf.

Between all of the speeches, singing and sobbing I made some pictures. Maybe even a few good ones.

Oh and by the way … one of the wonderful musicians I listened to was an immigrant. How fitting!

All in all, a pretty damn fine and meaningful day if you ask me!

Stay well,

Michael

It was pretty dreary outside, but I wasn’t deterred. After all, the marching bands and the cub scouts were out there, so why shouldn’t I be?  Every year I photograph the parade and the always moving memorial at the cemetery that follows its conclusion. Though it rained on and off I think I got some good pictures and maybe even a keeper or two.

So thinking about that meaningful day and what it stands for … remembrance of all those that fought and made the ultimate sacrifice for our country, as well as the many POWs and MIAs that never made it home … I was struck about these unselfish and brave men and women who stand in stark contrast to the steaming turd currently occupying the Oval Office and all the terrible things he has done in less that a year and a half since his return.

Here are just some of the current highlights out of the many that have made a mockery of our democracy and jeopardized our national security and standing in the world.

Where to begin?

How about the illegal war with Iran?

But wait there’s so much more!

His continued fawning over Putin while making NATO weaker.

His agreement to give China some of our most sensitive technology.

The now billion dollar ballroom.

The monstrous and obnoxious arch that just got jammed through the “packed” National Capital Planning Commission.

Paving over the beautiful and historic rose garden to make a patio that resembles the one at Mar-a-Lago.

Putting El Jefe’s face everywhere possible with the latest illegal idea of creating a new $250 dollar bill that includes his likeness.

Construction of a gargantuan Ultimate Fighting Championship arena on the South Lawn for cage matches to be held on His Highness’ 80th birthday.

His demand to red states to redraw Congressional districts and his promotion of the reimposition of Jim Crow to maintain Republican control of the House of Representatives.

His actions to turn our government into a kleptocracy.

His corruption of the Department of Justice in support of his ongoing “revenge tour”.  His actions to turn ICE into a paramilitary organization used to terrorize both immigrants and US citizens.

And last but not least, his attempt to create a $1.776 billion taxpayer dollar slush fund to pay off those that nearly destroyed the Capitol building on January 6th, coupled with getting the IRS to he and his family and the Trump Organization immune from any IRS enforcement actions or audits based on past filings.

There are also many pieces of good news, including this one … A federal judge has ruled this past week that Trump’s name was illegally added to the Kennedy Center and must be removed.

Which leads me to the following.

Research shows that Hitler and all autocrats were enabled by the many average citizens who buried their heads in the sand or just chose to look away while things got worse and worse.  If they had only stood up, things might have been far different.

Our democracy hangs in the balance.

Don’t make the same fatal mistake others did.

Oh … and keep making pictures that matter to you.

Stay well,

Michael

A couple of weeks ago I went to the opening of the Bruce Katsiff exhibit at the Michener Art Museum where I got the chance to meet Bruce himself. But because it was so crowded I really didn’t have a chance to seriously study things I would have liked. Katsiff is a photographic legend in Bucks County so I had to come back!

I enjoyed our conversation so much that I asked Bruce on the spot if he would like to get together for lunch! We scheduled the time to meet, but before that I needed to get over and see the exhibit again! Entitled Bruce Katsiff: Pieces of Life, it’s a wonderful sampling of key projects from a lifetime work, including Rivertown Portraits, 1970-1980, composed of large black and white portraits made of his neighbors in nearby Lumberville,  where he had lived; Nature Norte, 1981-2005, striking platinum prints of animal remains; Face Maps, large color distorted and rearranged portraits of friend and family; street scenes made in Europe and Latin America during the fifties and sixties, as well as photographs melded to together with paintings and drawings done in collaboration with other artists. The shows runs through August 2^nd. Highly recommended!

Next up, lunch with Bruce. What a wonderful time I had! Bruce is funny and a great guy!  I heard all sorts of stories from his great career including ones about the great legends he had met. What fun! Most interesting though was how he categorized photographs … either as “directed” or “windows to nature”.  The former were constructed or created; the later were what was found and seen in the world. Simple and it makes sense!

Finally, I attended Bruce’s lecture at the Michener on the history of photography up to the dawn of digital capture. Truly outstanding and entertaining!  So much so that I asked Bruce if he would be willing to give it again at CAMP!  He has agreed and we look forward to scheduling it later this year!

Bruce is a great photographer … and a terrific and supportive guy!  I wish there were more like him and look forward to staying in contact in the future!

Stay well,

Michael

You never know how these things are going to turn out, especially for something brand new, but I’ve got to say, the gallery was packed for our show’s opening, the inaugural event at CAMP! The gallery was beautiful and the darkroom and workroom were ready to go with full capabilities to print 35mm up to 8×10 negatives, as well as contact prints using alternative processes!  It was very gratifying to see people I know and to meet new friends interested in black and white analog photography. It was also great to see the work of my Monalog colleagues again and to talk with guests about the stories behind my photographs.

CAMP is off to a great start and I will serve as Executive Director to help get it up and running with more exhibits to come, along with lectures, workshops and other cool programs to be announced.

The Monalog show runs to July 11^th on Saturdays 12-5pm and by appointment. I’d love to see you. So if you plan to be in the area how about stopping by to check out CAMP and see what all the fuss is about!

Stay well,

Michael

Since I was sixteen, except for some early years of marriage and impoverishment, I’ve always had my own car, even if it was a beater. But recently, I decided to sell my beloved hardtop/convertible (A very neat car … the best of all worlds!).  I did it for a couple of reasons. It wasn’t very practical which often meant I had to rent a car rather than leave my wife stranded without one. And with 16 mpg city/20 mpg highway and a hunger for premium it was costing a small fortune to keep running (The high octane stuff is now creeping toward $6.00 where I live unless I’m near a Costco).

So now we’re down to one car and I’m going to do my best to work it out with my wife so we can both be happy.  But it may not always be possible to schedule who gets it when, time I’d be gone, etc. The easy thing to do would be to buy a Prius or an all-electric vehicle … sorry not a Tesla for some obvious reasons you may think of. That means for the time being I’m going to try to make this work out despite the psychological hit I seem to be taking … my rugged individualism and independence … that sort of thing.

The key question is what will this do to my photography?  Well the short answer is not much. Why? Because I’m not going to let it!

The easy thing would be to dial things back or only photograph really nearby. While focusing primarily on what is really close might actually be a good thing for a variety of reasons, I’m just not going to let that happen. If anything, now that my car is gone, I’m going to move ahead without it being a diversion in my life that it had become, work hard to schedule things with my wife and just rent a car whenever I need one. It’s really pretty simple when you think about it.

Well, there is one reoccurring problem that seems to be popping up in the new world order. Our remaining car … my wife’s … is very nice, but very complicated … at least for me.  No surprise there!  Every setting has been set up perfectly to suit her needs and believe me I don’t want to get in the way of that. It’s got a lot of faux buttons on the very large touch screen that serves as the center of all things. So here’s a newsflash … despite my best intentions, I’ve somehow managed to screw things up several times.

Toleration probably has its limits so I’ll try to be better … I promise.

So what would this kind of change to your life do to your photography?

There’s always an excuse you can find not to get out there … like getting rid of your car. Don’t fall for them!

Stay well,

Michael

I tend to think of lenses in their 35mm equivalents. Ok, so I don’t own a 40mm lens, but I have the fabulous Plaubel Makina 670 with the stupendous fixed mount Nikkor 80mm lens. That’s the 6×7 equivalent of the smaller format 40mm lens. Yes, there are some quirks with using the Plaubel, but it’s truly my all time favorite, because of the camera operation, the lens itself and the perspective its focal length provides. But there is another reason … it just may be the perfect focal length for the vast number of subjects I’m interested in or come across … and it may be the same for you!

I’ve always considered myself a 50mm kind of guy, and historically that lens or its equivalent has been my focal length of choice. But as time goes by, the more I think about it, it seems I’ve been drawn to medium format cameras that use an 80mm lens, be it the Mamiya 7/7II or the Plaubel Makina. I’ve owned and used three Plaubels during the last 40 years, and now that camera/lens combination has essentially become my go to.

Why?

I think in large part, the single most compelling reason is that it enables me to accomplish just about anything I want for almost any situation I find myself in. In 35mm terms, there’s no thinking about whether I need to switch from using my go to 50mm for the 35, or when I’m using 35mm whether I need to go back to the 50. Of course with my Leica’s I can use both my M3 and the ridged 50mm Summicron along with my M2 and the 35mm f/2.8 Summaron. While I’ve done that many times, but found that I often seemed to finish a roll of film in the M3/50mm but not in M2/35mm, with the unfinished roll sitting in the M2 for a long time.

I’ve have gotten away from that approach when using 35mm cameras and have gravitated towards just using my M2 with both the 50mm and 35mm lenses. But here’s another problem … once I mount a particular lens on a camera, especially when I’m on the street, I tend to leave it on and adjust as opportunities present themselves rather than change lenses back and forth. In fact, that is exactly what happened a couple of weeks ago when I photographed the No Kings protest here in Doylestown. I don’t feel this has kept me from making good pictures, but maybe I could be making better ones, or doing less cropping in the darkroom for example if I switched lenses as appropriate.

In medium format land, the 80mm solves that problem wonderfully. Perhaps one of the reasons is that it turns out to be very close to the way the eye sees. A 40mm lens on a 35mm camera would do the same thing.

So where does all this leave me? I still want to be able to have the option of using other lenses when the occasion calls for them, e.g., making photographs of murals might require using both wider and longer lenses.  And I still will be using a 35mm camera as the situation calls for it, or just maybe when the mood happens to strike me.

I promise this isn’t a sudden GAS attack, but maybe I’ll find either a 40mm lens that will most likely work best with my M3 (supposedly I would have to judge composition just outside the 50mm frame lines), or get a Leica CL or Minolta CL (the camera bodies and lenses are the same … apparently they were jointly designed by Leitz and Minolta), or possibly a Minolta CLE with its updated lens. All three were designed to use the 40mm natively. Finally, I might even try a much cheaper option, but one that could work just as well sans the Leica cachet, and pick up an old Olympus 35RC with its fixed and apparently quite good 42mm f/2.8 lens. Nice ones can be had for about $150 bucks!

Fun fact … I discovered that Henri Cartier Bresson had used a CL to do a project in nearby New Jersey!

Is it a sign?

I guess you can tell I’ve started to think about this!

Trouble is I really love my vintage Summicron and Summaron lenses!!!

Stay well,

Michael

I recently stumbled across a black and white film photographer with an interesting YouTube channel. He does good work and his videos are fairly entertaining. As I was digging into his video archive I noticed he had done something concerning the importance of focusing on a single photograph … quality vs. quantity. Fair enough. He essentially went through his entire process, all the way to mounting, matting and framing.  I was fine with everything except for one important thing. He scans his negatives so he can review them on his computer instead of making proof sheets.

You might say this isn’t a big deal, but I think it is. In fact, I think it’s a really BIG DEAL!!! Look, if you’re going to be an analog photographer, BE ONE ALL THE WAY and forget about viewing your negatives using Lightroom or whatever else is out there.

Yes, I know … it’s fast and yes it’s easy to do it that way. But that’s not the point is it. Art is hard, so why look for fast and easy when you can do things slow and steady and get much more out of it? Otherwise, I think you are just fooling yourself. Our photographer spent over six hours to get the final print he liked, then went to the trouble to expertly spot the print where necessary.  Great, but why take all this time and effort, only to replace one of the most important series of steps … making the proof sheet, then carefully studying it for size, composition, cropping, print tonality, etc. ON THE PAPER YOU’RE GOING TO PRINT ON … and replacing all of this by merely staring at the screen, looking at thumbnails?

My answer won’t make those looking for fast and easy happy. Sorry, but here it is.  Don’t shortchange yourself for the sake of speed and convenience. Art is hard … at least good art is.

Stay well,

Michael